Political Scandals of Bulgaria
By Naveed Qazi | Editor, Globe Upfront
The ambiance of these protests were such, as if the memories of 2013 protests had been fresh in
the minds of many Bulgarians, when the French ambassador protested amongst the
demonstrators against the grip of the oligarchs on the country. At that time,
protests were also due to the interruption of EU funding and students also occupied
the Sofia University.
Metrics, such as by Transparency International
indicate that the perception of corruption in Bulgaria is highest in the
European Union. In 2019, the Rule
of Law Index put
Bulgaria in the league as Russia for corruption of the executive. The
level of corruption is now above Romania in European Union. Even in the 2020
Investment Climate Statement for Bulgaria, the US Department of State concluded
that corruption remains endemic. It is an
issue for which even the centre-right GERB party and the centre-left BSP have
blamed each other for. Despite joining the EU in 2007, successive
Bulgarian governments have failed to implement crucial reforms.
Petar Cholakov, associate professor with the Institute of
Sociology at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, commented that the public has
been exhausted with the ‘litany of revelations of underhand behaviour’ by those
in power. Citizens had also asked questions about where EU funds
intended to improve public services in Bulgaria ended up, according to Dimitar
Beshev, lecturer on Eastern Europe and Russia at the University of North
Carolina, Chapel Hill.
The protests had continued for over two months mainly
because the general prosecutor had been accused of being a hatchet man of the then
Borissov government. Online,
thousands signed petitions. In the street protests, people threw firecrackers,
and in return were attacked by batons and water cannons. It led to hundreds being
arrested, and many were badly beaten. It even included a journalist, who had
shown his press card but still was not spared.
In 2020, many other administrative problems arose, which
contributed to the frustrations, as the winter was also marked by a water
crisis caused by the drying up of several dams, the most serious of which took
place in the town of Pernik, 45km southwest of Sofia. The water shortage
happened due to lack of maintenance of vital infrastructure and government
leniency towards large industries abusing local water reserves.
In its recent political past, there
were important turns of events in 2016, when during the presidential election,
the presidency came under Rumen Radev, a former air force commander. This led
to institutional conflict as Radev criticised the government and then Prime
Minister Boyko Borisov over the state of corruption in Bulgaria.
The crises continued to escalate as compromising
pictures showing the prime minister sleeping in his bedroom next to a
drawer packed full of 500-euro bills, gold bars and a gun.
There were also his leaked voice recordings where he crudely
mouthed off about a political colleague. It had stoked anger, representing a kind of turf
war, but he put the blame on opposition figures, including the president. This
was followed by another scandal, as former minister of justice Hristo Ivanov
led a group of activists from his reformist ‘Yes, Bulgaria!’ party, a catch all
party founded to fight corruption, to the residence of influential oligarch and
former chairman of the Turkish minority DPS party Ahmed Dogan, near the town of
Rosenets, on a public beach, who regarded it as his own home.
The activists, however, were told to leave by
security guards, who Radev later confirmed worked for the National Security
Service, which is funded by the government and was protecting another oligarch,
a DPS MP and media mogul Delyan Peevski. In the meantime, Chief Prosecutor Ivan
Geshev, whose appointment was controversial in itself and was at first vetoed
by Radev, was implicated in the ‘Eight Dwarfs’ extortion scandal along with
numerous magistrates. This led to more criticism of the government by the
opposition.
The situation reached a breaking point when the
prosecution, with the help of police, raided the presidency in July 2020 on the grounds of
conspiracy and sharing of state secrets. Numerous people were arrested,
including one of the president’s advisors.
It was shortly after the breach into the presidency, when the protests gained momentum two months after. It was followed by a speech by Radev in support of the protesters and he also demanded the resignation of the chief of the NSS, Geshev and Borissov, but they refused to resign. On the contrary, Borisov offered to overhaul his country’s political system through some worrying constitutional changes, perceived as attempts to settle the governing party’s hold on power, such as reducing the number of MPs. It also removed constitutional guarantees for the equality between men and women replacing them with ‘pro-natalist’ and ‘family values’ paragraphs. Borisov’s constitutional exercise was aimed at buying him time in power, which infuriated the protestors, because he suggested parliamentary debates for constitutional changes for five months, which coincided until the 2021 Bulgarian election.
When protests continued, videos of police violence against a
young protester were made public. The boulevard in front of the National
Assembly was briefly blocked, and an unsuccessful motion of no confidence and
government reshuffle followed.
These moments shook Bulgaria’s political history. The protest movement was not cohesive by any means, as it represented different groups from all political spectrums. Although organised mainly by the liberals, it included turbo folk singers, apolitical hipsters, artists, radical left, Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP) and its splinters.
As more roadblocks were set up in the capital Sofia and the
protest movement spread across the country, it started hurting the EU’s ethos. In an article by Denica Yotova in European Council on Foreign
Relations: ‘from a European foreign policy point of view, Bulgaria is an
external border of the EU, and thus plays an important role in migration,
security, relations with Turkey, and relations with Russia and the Black Sea
region. If Bulgaria fails to address properly any of these challenges, this
will be felt quickly in other parts of Europe. Furthermore, the complexity of
Bulgaria’s immediate neighbourhood is such that it risks setting a negative
example for neighbouring Western Balkans countries as their governments
consider what reforms they need to make in the future.’
Another problem
is perhaps the judiciary system in Bulgaria which is an unprecedented
case as a non-functioning system within the EU. Over the years, successive
scandals have called into question its independence. Civil society
organisations in Bulgaria have long campaigned for judicial reforms, and have
received the support of the Bulgarian Judges Association in this
endeavour.
Hence, the
political crises in Bulgaria are also a threat to the future stability of the
EU. Bulgaria has just entered ERM II, the Eurozone’s waiting room, and political
stability in the country, based on rule of law, democracy, a functioning
judicial system, and effective anti-corruption mechanisms, are crucial to
eventual membership of the Euro. Hence, ensuring
reforms is something that the previous
governments have consistently failed at.
When
the national rule of law safeguards are no longer working, it is a
responsibility of the EU institutions to take action. A recent
case by the European court of justice has reminded that independent justice
system is not only a standard in a democracy but a legal obligation in regard
of article 19 of the treaty on the European Union. But Europe has been just
watching how democracy withers in Bulgaria. This form of attitude is a real
ostrascisation towards Bulgaria by the EU.
Comments
Post a Comment
Advice from the Editor: Please refrain from slander, defamation or any kind of libel in the comments section.