Skip to main content

Wars and States

 By Naveed Qazi | Editor, Globe Upfront


What is causing these endless wars, in terms of socialist perceptions in our modern world? Many powerful politicians, especially from the west, have said to have betrayed their ideals. Often what is articulated by powerful politicians before they come into power hasn't come true.

Socialism has been a moral scale for human upliftment. It has been a great intellectual reminder, practised in our world, which gave the world new and credible forces of democracy, power to the working class,  several welfare initiatives that produced several social dimensions which deserve to get instituted in a so-called ideal state for the workers. However, these ideas haven't been practiced well always.  Any form of conflict obstructing a ruling  state bears a testimony to this.

There are certain rules as well. Workers see themselves committed to some form of radical change through various political parties which are given birth through various ideas. Nigel Harris believes that armed struggle forms the basis for winning power. Once that power is achieved, people also see new oppressors. We also see States using military power to suppress people and so on. This is a profane cycle in Marxism. We have also seen States being made instruments of slavery, oppression, where several rights are targeted, where poverty, unemployment, bad economic structures and ignorance loom, and were citizens are discriminated. This never implemented the ideas of socialism.

Many modern states have been war economies as well. They want to emancipate their powerful states through every welfare measure, every social right, every economic reform, every productive political deals, but have different perceptions on other countries: they plunder and fight for oil, some want to arm rebels there, some want to overthrow governments, some want to kill other politicians and some simply target civilians in other countries - in guise of bringing stability, they collaborate with ruling governments and overthrow and bring their new puppets in power. This form of shoddy morality was never right, at least would have never been imagined by several charismatic thinkers of socialism. They have forgotten the adages where thinkers like Marx believed about universality in worker reform.

World is now abuzz with stories of immigrant discrimination that don't allow new people to integrate into their new societies justly, due to sense of cultural and other social orientations. Racism also is a bad form of oppressing certain people.  Modern States could use better policies in helping poorer nations but they do not.

The megalomania of Obama's administration or his predecessor do narrate a sort of fascist and imperial agenda in recent times, by characterless politicians who impose bloodshed by being mad with pride and due to the power they enjoy from their Senates. United States, for example, has spent two hundred years in militarism. They forgot that nationalism in the end carries no higher value. It is just a form of community cohesion of certain cultural and other social traits.

These endless wars are fought against the state because an individual or a certain group lose their faith in the ruling state, due to certain paradigms which constitute in such a functioning state. Our world is reminiscing the bad ways of the past like Spanish conquistadors in Latin America using indigenous labour and resources for their booties in guise of feudalism for their mother country under socialism. Unfortunately blood has been spilled to bring changes in the world, and it will continue in these modern times as well. People have lost faith in the systems of their nations, and in globalisation which is also driven by certain controversial agendas. That's why we see rebel groups fighting against the governments.

Lenin openly theorised war of the guns by certain people who made sure that these ruling people never come back into power. This losing of faith set the standards for a new change, a perception having convergences in the thoughts of Mao and Che. Engels thought that people in minority will bring the new change, who are the rebels. People who demand change. But war doesn't really define socialism, there were many thinkers who wanted to bring a bloodless change, but unfortunately wars have been a means, a pivotal cause for achieving power. That's how war and states come in contact.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

String of Pearls

Photo source: Indian Express By Naveed Qazi | Editor, Globe UpFront For quite some time, China has been in the quest for political, military and economic espionage. This has been done through a network of installations known as the ‘String of Pearls’.  It is aimed to project a dominating presence in littoral South Asia. One such aim exhibited by the ‘String of Pearls’ strategy is the maritime dominance. By embarking on this approach, China wants to counter other superpowers such as the United States. There are some who support China’s geopolitical rise against American hegemony for a needful balance of power. In fact, what China wants to do, has been already done in the past by the British, Portuguese, Dutch and Spaniards, during the colonial times.   Indian strategists fear that Chinese economic buildup, due to the advent of ports in Colombo, Sri Lanka (Sri Lankan government leased Hambantota port for a 99-year lease to the Chinese, where the latter agre...

Farewell Note by Editor

  In thirteen years of writing journey, Globe Upfront went on a crusade to disseminate long form writing on myriad global issues. Due to some circumstances, the writer of the blog won’t be able to write on the beat anymore. A farewell note from the writer is apt for a time like this. While writing for Globe Upfront, author Naveed Qazi was also praised by some in the local media. He mentions this blog as part of his fulfilment journey towards societal emancipation. He also acknowledges that it’s a journey that he would cherish in future as an intellectual nostalgia.

Italy's Fractured Democracy

Photo source: The Nation By Naveed Qazi | Editor, Globe Upfront It has been an eventful election in Italy in March 2018. A hung parliament means that cutting deals to form a coalition government, has become pivotal, to end the political stalemate. However, since March 4, 2018 a month has passed, but still, there have been a series of failed negotiations between the centre-right political parties. The Five Star Movement – M5S has emerged as the single largest party, having a populist message, whereas the League has gained ‘historic strides’ in the vote share this time around. After the Italian election, many things have become clearer. The election reflects that a large number of Italians favour a Euroskeptic, and a strongly nationalist political base. Like the Brits and the Greeks, the Italians don’t have positive opinions of the European Union. This is a stark difference between them and the Germans and the French now, who loathe about the benefits of staying in the Eurozone. H...